Hi everyone,
Just wanted to post a new blog which will hopefully not contain anything that my readers consider inflamatory or otherwise annoying. Well, actually, I just want to write a space science blog and your emotional state is your own business...
Interesting article on the Kepler Mission. To refresh you all, and this is exciting stuff, Kepler is up in space pointing at one particular section of the sky which is continuously images. It is looking at the brightness of all the stars in that section of the sky. Now, if a small planet orbiting goes in front of the star, from our point of view, Kepler should see a very small decrease in the amount of light coming from the star and when the planet goes behind the star, Kepler should see a smaller decrease in light as the planet's reflected light is now not visable. Clear as mud, well, it does indeed work. We have identified a planet around another star which does exhibit the orbital orientation necessary for this to work and we used this as a test case for Kepler. Voila! Things behaive as expected - which is why we all love science, isn't it. Unless of course you don't believe in the scientific method, of course - which I know all the bloggerets out there do! Right!
So, here is the article from MSNBC, which has a great science section (more on that later):
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32319679/ns/technology_and_science-space/So, what else to tell you about... Hmmm... Well, how about some NASA news? I have a bit of a long winded story to get us to an article here but there is no point in apologising for it, we have to follow it though from start to finish.
I own a very cool piece of technology, a Sony PRS-700, PRS stands for Personal Reading System. This is basically an eBook which holds some vast number of tomes, more if you stick in extra memory (which I have) and I brought it with me, as I always do, here to Africa preloaded with a bunch of reading - keeps me out of the bars, mostly. Anyway, two great books I brought with me this time:
Censoring Science by Mark Bowen (
http://www.mark-bowen.com/book_cs.html) and
Unscientific America by Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum (
http://www.unscientificamerica.com/), the nice folks who brought our American Cousins
ScienceDebate2008 during the US Election last year. Anyway a feature of both of these books is that they talk about the marginalization of science, and in fact its outright censorship, during the dark ages (AKA Bush Years - 2000 to 2008 AD). Interestingly Michael Griffin, the head of NASA in the later part of the Bush Administration came across as a bit of an ideolog and coward in both of these books, certainly moreso in the first but alluded to, I think, in the second as well.
Griffin, as you may remember, was the architect of the Constellation Program and a contributor to the only decent thing Bush did, his
Vision for Space Exploration. Well, after reading the books, I begin to understand why the Obama administration so wanted rid of the guy - his clear brilliance aside. He was a critical player in censoring information with respect to climate change as well eviserating the planetary research budget for NASA - he even (according to Bowen) was clandestinely responsible for the reshaping of NASA's mission statement (
http://www.physorg.com/news72971590.html). Well, perhaps we are well rid of him but I must say, his approach to manned spaceflight is one that I agree with. Saying all of that, and we are finally getting to the end of this tortured tale here, NASA is reviewing that with the Augustine Commission which is to present its findings at the end of this month. As a taste, here is an article on their short list options:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32307312/ns/technology_and_science-space/I personally like the "Dash out of LEO", "Lunar Global" and "Mars Direct" scenarios but would prefer "Lunar Global" and would least like "DooLEO". We shall see...
One of the other things that both books, particularly Unscientific America discuss is the inability of the population to understand and relate to science and, further, to fail to see the benefits therein. This is partly due to the free market nature of news broadcasting and which caters to individual interests which are more "News you can use" or celebrity stuff (don't get me started about Michael Jackson - I am upset enough about the skinny on Michael Griffin) and are eliminate thier science departments. The MSNBC Science Page is a refreshing oasis of knowlege in a
Demon Haunted World (apologies to the late great Carl Sagan).
Well, got to go, space cadets, catch you when I get to the Northern Hemisphere, or maybe sooner.
Paul